MPM baru bertunas, bukan Melayu jenis Tay Ting Yan, (Timbalan Editor SIN CHEW JIT POH) bangkit untuk meracunnya.
Melayu memadu kuasa hanya untuk menuntut hak mereka untuk dikongsi sama dengan bukan Melayu.
Bila Melayu mamadu kuasa, merampas Tanah Air dari British, dan mempelawa bukan Melayu memperjuangkan kemerdekaan sama, sebahagian bukan Melayu jenis Chin Peng, memasuki hutan memaduakan kuasa mereka, dan mengundang kuasa asing, untuk mencairkan kuasa Melayu berkongsi sama apa yang mereka ada dengan saudara-saudara mereka dari bukan Melayu.
Sebahagian lagi bukan Melayu dahulu, jenis nenek-moyang jenis Tay Ting Yan, (Timbalan Editor SIN CHEW JIT POH) besatu di bandar-bandar, berpersatuan-persatuan seperti Suqiu, Dong Zong atau Hindraf dan lain-lain, juga untuk mencairkan kuasa Melayu mengkongsi sama apa yang mereka ada.
Sebahagian lagi bukan Melayu jenis Lim Kit Siang - Guan Eng, meresap ke dalam masyarakat membentuk kuasa mereka melalui parti-parti politik, yang chauvinistik, kiasu, dan amat rasist sekali, yang condong kepada perjuangan kominis Chin Peng .... juga untuk mencairkan kuasa Melayu yang semulajadi bersifat pemurah dengan mengongsi sama apa yang mereka ada dengan orang lain.
Oleh kerana kelemahan pemimpin Melayu jenis Tengku Abdul Rahman, melalui sifat "dermawan" mereka, bukan Melayu memperoleh Temasik secara percuma untuk jenis mereka sahaja.
Oleh kerana kelemahan pemimpin Melayu jenis Abdullah Badawi, pemimpin bukan Melayu jenis Lim Kit Siang - Guan Eng merampas Pulau Mutiara dengan bantuan Melayu jenis Ketol-Mandaliar bernama Anuar Ibrahim, yang nyata juga mengundang kuasa asing bagi menyerang institusi-institusi Melayu dan agamanya. Bukan Melayu jenis Lim Kit Siang - Guan Eng ini turut menguasai dua negeri lagi melalui Melayu boneka-proksi bernama Nizar dan Khalid.
Munkinkah melalui pemimpin Melayu jenis Najib, Melayu akan kehilangan banyak lagi? Najib amat disanjung oleh si kiasu.
Baru sahaja Melayu berhimpun ala-penentang-Malayan-Union, di bawah panji-panji Majlis Permuafakatan Melayu (MPM) untuk melapis kerja yang dahulunya didokong oleh sayap Pemuda yang kini lumpuh, ramai bukan Melayu jenis Tay-Ting-Yan-Timbalan-Editor-SIN-CHEW-JIT-POH mengeluarkan suara samseng biadab-sumbang, memperkecil, mencemoh, memperlekeh bukan sahaja usaha MPM malah orang-orangannya sekali.
Hakikatnya mereka memperlekeh semua orang Melayu. Hakikatnya ini menzahirkan tanggapan pandang-rendah jenis mereka terhadap bangsa Melayu yang menerima mereka ke pangkuan. Mereka ini gemuk kerana terlalu ramai jenis-pemimpin-Melayu-yang-lembik, yang tidak kenal bangsa sendiri.
MPM baharu bangun memperingatkan PM mereka yang kelihatannya terlalu liberalistik (tidak bertempat?) yang jika berterusan munkin akan menyamai dan mengulang rekod Tengku Abdul Rahman dahulu, jenis Tay Ting Yan, (Timbalan Editor SIN CHEW JIT POH) sudah mencungulkan kepala, memulakan operasi cantas-sedari-tunas, yang besar kemunkinan akan disambut sahut-bersahutan oleh bukan Melayu yang sejenis dengannya.
Malaysia aman dan makmur dibawah kepimpinan yang diterajui Melayu. Lima puluh tahun membuktikannya. Bukan Melayu jenis Suqiu, Dong Zong atau Hindraf, jenis Tay Ting Yan, Lim Kit Siang - Guan Eng atau Chin Peng amat tidak senang dengan kedudukan aman ini. Mereka mahukan Malaysia untuk mereka sahaja, melalui gula-gula bernama Malaysian Malaysia atau Middle Malaysia atau apa pun.
Untuk mendapatkan ini semua mereka perlu destabilise negara Malaysia. Mereka kutuk, perbodoh, momok dan hina segala tindak tanduk Melayu. Mereka sebarkan segala kebaikan Melayu sebagai keburukan. Mereka sanjungi segala keburukan jenis Anuar, Pak Lah dan Tengku, dan segala kehilafan mursyid Aziz sebagai menara segala kebaikan. Mereka membakar darah dan dada. Mereka membangkitkan ketidakpuasan di merata-rata tempat dan keadaan. Anak Melayu yang baharu mengenal dunia, lambat laun akan terpengaruh juga. Terikut-ikut tidak puas hati, terbakar dada, terbakar darah, lalu merampage di mana sempat.
Dan baharu-baharu ini mereka mencemuh Melayu yang baharu sahaja berhimpun di bawah panji-panji MPM. Nip this MPM in the bud they say. Semua yang bermata satu, pasti percaya dakyah mereka.
Sebenarnya kita bukan perlu setakat satu MPM sahaja. Malah kita perlu tiga empat lagi. Jika kumpulan-kumpulan Melayu yang ada sudah tidak boleh diperbaiki ..... patah tumbuh, hilang berganti kata pepatah.
Namun semua ini, untuk berjaya tidak boleh lari dari berlandaskan kepada satu landasan sahaja: iaitu menuntut kepada apa yang diRedhoi Tuhan. Jika ia menuntut (berjuang) kepada keuntungan peribadi umpamanya, ia akan berjaya, tetapi kejayaannya setakat seprti "kejayaan" Pemuda Umno. Lumpuh. Tidak bermaya. Impotent. Munkinkah ini misi bukan Melayu jenis Tay Ting Yan, (Timbalan Editor SIN CHEW JIT POH?
Munkinkah kerana ini, MPM muncul berdiri memangku tugas?
SSUS - PERJUANGAN YANG BERTERUSAN
Satu Bahasa Satu Bangsa Satu Negara
Showing posts with label Malaysia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Malaysia. Show all posts
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Murtad Bangsa
Ketuanan Melayu. Ini satu daripada elemen-elemen perjuangan Malay survival. Setiap Melayu adalah pejuangnya. Tiada siapa berhak menafikan ini dari Melayu memperjuangkan kelangsungan kedaulatan kemelayuannya di atas tanah tumpah darah sendiri.
Murtad Melayu. Murtad dari Islam ... tinggallah bangsa yang ada padanya. Tetapi jika murtad dari Melayu? Melayu bukan, apa pun bukan? Bangsa apa itu? Itek tak sudu ayam tak patuk. PKR kutip.
Malaysian murtad. Hindraf dan segala chauvanis anasir anti-Melayu anti-Islam pun bangsa Malaysia yang sudah murtad. Masuk Omputih. Di rumah ... sesame sendiri cakap Omputih ... kulit tak Omputih ... di luar rumah caci hamun sultan. Murtad Malaysian.
Si anti-Melayu dengan sengaja mentafsirkan ketuanan Melayu sebagai hubungan tuan dengan hamba. Melayu tuan mereka hamba ... akibatnya timbul kebencian terhadap Melayu. Lalu mereka menangguk di air keruh.
Dari asal lagi, sebelum pendatang anti-Melayu ini datang pun, Raja-Raja dan bangsa Melayu adalah tuan rantau ini. Begitulah, setiap kewujudan ada tuannya. Sedangkan busut ada tuannya, ada penunggunya. Inikan pula darah Melayu dalam kenegaraan Melayu.
Ini rantau Melayu. Ketuanannya pastilah berlandaskan Melayu dan Kemelayuannya. Begitulah di rantau India, berdirilah di sana ketuanan Indian; di Jepun berdiri ketuanan Jepun; di China berdiri ketuanan Cina. Di mana pun begitu. Hanya di sini chauvanis, anti-Melayu anti-Islam keturunan pendatang bermati-matian hendak memadam Ketuanan Melayu ... dengan dipendekari oleh Melayu murtad.
Pada satu ketika ramailah pendatang dibenarkan kongsi kuasa melalui kepunyaan – mereka dibenarkan mempunyai tanah, rumah dsbnya. Merekalah tuan punya kepada herta mereka.
Tanah Melayu adalah tercorak atas ciri kemelayuan –- budayanya, bahasanya, resamnya, resminya, rasmiya, kedaulatannya, Raja-Rajanya, agamanya, keidentitiannya dll sebagainya. Ketuanan Melayu berdiri di atas nilai-nilai tersebut.
Kemudian, pada satu ketika, kaum pendatang dan keturunan mereka, terutama yang chauvanis anti-Melayu anti-Islam, apabila mereka menyangka merekalah pencarum terbesar kepada kekayaan negara, mereka merasa pula merekalah tuan kepada negara. Mereka mula tuntut hak sama konon, dengan mula mendakwa bahawa Melayu juga kaum pendatang dan sebagainya. Dan memburukkan Melayu sebagai “tuan” yang menumpang kepada “kekayaan” mereka melalui tafsiran bahawa Ketuanan Melayu adalah hubungan “tuan – hamba”.
Ketuanan Melayu bukan berdiri di atas “kebesaran harta atau kepunyaan keatas harta kekayaan” sahaja. Bangsa Palestine menolak ketuanan Yahudi walaupun Israel jauh lebih kaya dan gagah dari mereka. Ketuanan Melayu berdiri terutamanya di atas “kemelayuan dengan norma-norma budaya, bahasa, resam, resmi, rasmi, kedaulatan, Raja-Raja Melayu, agama, keidentitian dll sebagainya” yang di atas.
Maka mana-mana bukan-Melayu boleh berdiri dalam ruang lingkup ketuanan Melayu hanya apabila dia sudah terserap kedalam norma-norma tersebut dan mengamalkannya sebagai norma Bangsa Malaysia. Sekali-kali tidak selagi mereka masih mengamalkan norma kebudayaan, bahasa, resam dllsbgnya negara asal usul mereka.
Tidak ada Melayu yang akan menerima (kecuali Melayu murtad) dakwaan dan desakan bukan-Melayu untuk mengongsi kesamarataan ketuanan semata-mata atas dasar kepunyaan harta dan penguasaan kekayaan sahaja. Nilai “ketuanan” tidak pernah terletak kepada asset yang tangible yang mengurang mengikut kekerapan penggunaan. Ketuanan Melayu berdiri di atas nilai kemelayuan yang semakin menokok tambah dengan kekerapan penggunaan.
Wadahnya sudah disediakan. Bangsa Malaysia. Melayu sanggup menjadi Malaysia. Mengapa tidak si bukan Melayu?
Tetapi malang. Segala murtad yang chauvanis, anti-Melayu anti-Islam, sudah mula memberi tafsiran yang tersendiri terhadap “Bangsa Malaysia,” - tafsiran yang mengikut acuan dan pewarnaan citarasa unilateral ‘vested interest’ mereka.
Jika demikian, kita berminat pula kembali kepada setengah abad dahulu – lalu mencorak semula segala-galanya mengikut acuan asal – Bangsa Melayu.
Murtad Melayu. Murtad dari Islam ... tinggallah bangsa yang ada padanya. Tetapi jika murtad dari Melayu? Melayu bukan, apa pun bukan? Bangsa apa itu? Itek tak sudu ayam tak patuk. PKR kutip.
Malaysian murtad. Hindraf dan segala chauvanis anasir anti-Melayu anti-Islam pun bangsa Malaysia yang sudah murtad. Masuk Omputih. Di rumah ... sesame sendiri cakap Omputih ... kulit tak Omputih ... di luar rumah caci hamun sultan. Murtad Malaysian.
Si anti-Melayu dengan sengaja mentafsirkan ketuanan Melayu sebagai hubungan tuan dengan hamba. Melayu tuan mereka hamba ... akibatnya timbul kebencian terhadap Melayu. Lalu mereka menangguk di air keruh.
Dari asal lagi, sebelum pendatang anti-Melayu ini datang pun, Raja-Raja dan bangsa Melayu adalah tuan rantau ini. Begitulah, setiap kewujudan ada tuannya. Sedangkan busut ada tuannya, ada penunggunya. Inikan pula darah Melayu dalam kenegaraan Melayu.
Ini rantau Melayu. Ketuanannya pastilah berlandaskan Melayu dan Kemelayuannya. Begitulah di rantau India, berdirilah di sana ketuanan Indian; di Jepun berdiri ketuanan Jepun; di China berdiri ketuanan Cina. Di mana pun begitu. Hanya di sini chauvanis, anti-Melayu anti-Islam keturunan pendatang bermati-matian hendak memadam Ketuanan Melayu ... dengan dipendekari oleh Melayu murtad.
Pada satu ketika ramailah pendatang dibenarkan kongsi kuasa melalui kepunyaan – mereka dibenarkan mempunyai tanah, rumah dsbnya. Merekalah tuan punya kepada herta mereka.
Tanah Melayu adalah tercorak atas ciri kemelayuan –- budayanya, bahasanya, resamnya, resminya, rasmiya, kedaulatannya, Raja-Rajanya, agamanya, keidentitiannya dll sebagainya. Ketuanan Melayu berdiri di atas nilai-nilai tersebut.
Kemudian, pada satu ketika, kaum pendatang dan keturunan mereka, terutama yang chauvanis anti-Melayu anti-Islam, apabila mereka menyangka merekalah pencarum terbesar kepada kekayaan negara, mereka merasa pula merekalah tuan kepada negara. Mereka mula tuntut hak sama konon, dengan mula mendakwa bahawa Melayu juga kaum pendatang dan sebagainya. Dan memburukkan Melayu sebagai “tuan” yang menumpang kepada “kekayaan” mereka melalui tafsiran bahawa Ketuanan Melayu adalah hubungan “tuan – hamba”.
Ketuanan Melayu bukan berdiri di atas “kebesaran harta atau kepunyaan keatas harta kekayaan” sahaja. Bangsa Palestine menolak ketuanan Yahudi walaupun Israel jauh lebih kaya dan gagah dari mereka. Ketuanan Melayu berdiri terutamanya di atas “kemelayuan dengan norma-norma budaya, bahasa, resam, resmi, rasmi, kedaulatan, Raja-Raja Melayu, agama, keidentitian dll sebagainya” yang di atas.
Maka mana-mana bukan-Melayu boleh berdiri dalam ruang lingkup ketuanan Melayu hanya apabila dia sudah terserap kedalam norma-norma tersebut dan mengamalkannya sebagai norma Bangsa Malaysia. Sekali-kali tidak selagi mereka masih mengamalkan norma kebudayaan, bahasa, resam dllsbgnya negara asal usul mereka.
Tidak ada Melayu yang akan menerima (kecuali Melayu murtad) dakwaan dan desakan bukan-Melayu untuk mengongsi kesamarataan ketuanan semata-mata atas dasar kepunyaan harta dan penguasaan kekayaan sahaja. Nilai “ketuanan” tidak pernah terletak kepada asset yang tangible yang mengurang mengikut kekerapan penggunaan. Ketuanan Melayu berdiri di atas nilai kemelayuan yang semakin menokok tambah dengan kekerapan penggunaan.
Wadahnya sudah disediakan. Bangsa Malaysia. Melayu sanggup menjadi Malaysia. Mengapa tidak si bukan Melayu?
Tetapi malang. Segala murtad yang chauvanis, anti-Melayu anti-Islam, sudah mula memberi tafsiran yang tersendiri terhadap “Bangsa Malaysia,” - tafsiran yang mengikut acuan dan pewarnaan citarasa unilateral ‘vested interest’ mereka.
Jika demikian, kita berminat pula kembali kepada setengah abad dahulu – lalu mencorak semula segala-galanya mengikut acuan asal – Bangsa Melayu.
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Soi Lek's Tuan
Change The Game kata Soi Lek
Kata saya ...
Soi Lek is asking his tuan to accommodate him further. So did his predecessor. So did his predecessor's predecessor. So did his predecessor's predecessor's predecessor. They have been asking (conning?) for accommodation after accommodation after accommodation from their tuan ever since.
He asks from somebody who owns something. This makes that somebody the 'tuan punya'. But he refuses to acknowledge openly that this 'tuan' is the 'tuan yang empunya' simply because he refuses to learn the kesopanan dan kesusilaan of this 'tuan'. If this 'tuan' is orang putih, he would have no problem.
Without these handouts, these accommodation that he 'kautim' out of 'tuan punya kedaulatan', he just cannot move forward, he just cannot get any 'changes' at all. Any small change for this pengemis politik someone?
Repeat. "Without these handouts, these accommodation that he 'kautim' out of tuan punya kedaulatan, he just cannot move forward, he just cannot make any 'changes'."
Flip the pages of history. Look for any advancement without first being awarded with some semblance of accommodation. Look at the constitution. Most are values accommodated ... by the tuan punya kedaulatan.
Let us look at the Chi of PKR. Without the Mal (of PKR) can he be there now? Can the DAP be where it is without the PKR? Where would PKR & PR be without PAS. Where would MCA MIC be without UMNO. This is looking beyond ethnicity. The majority is the tuan punya kedaulatan.
"If Keadilan can project itself to be multiracial and be able to look after the interests of CHI or Indian community, it raises the possibility that MCA, MIC GERAKAN may not be relevant anymore." says Soi Lek.
So in order for you to stay relevant your ask your tuan to make the change? For a change, why not you make some 'changes'. You all are 50 year-old adults since merdeka. Act like one and stop this 'gun-boat' 'reality-showmanship' for accommodation.
This tuan doesn't aspire to be supreme over anybody as you put it. Allah Encompasses His Supremacy over all other than Him. What this 'tuan punya kedaulatan' doesn't want is a roommate that slyly works for more space for himself, that 'cry wolf' to win for himself accommodation by deviously juggling the universal call for 'change' whilst excluding himself from his pious call.
Our complacency cost us two-third majority and 5 states. They figured we are at our weakest. They would never want our political enemy to beg for any further 'Batu Putih'. They are too smart for that.
So they asked our roommate & bedfellow to do it so as not to be too obvious. So this 'advertisement' speech is put forward to get his master to make further 'changes'.
Must look beyond ethnicity indeed. Does he (did they? did they? did they?) make / made any relevant 'changes' at all? They never change. Soi Lek uses 'the 308 tsunami' to justify his 'gun-boat diplomacy' so that the faint-hearted 'see the logic' of the argument.
"Must produce what is advertised" otherwise no buyer. By that he means "Must accommodate further otherwise the CHI would not vote for me." He is appealing to our
'kera-di-hutan-disusukan-anak-di-pangkuan-mati-kelaparan' weakness and forever generosity.
Its best to 'Buat baik berpada-pada, buat jahat jangan sekali'. Its best the 'change' is not what Soi Lek demand of us. Its best that this 'change' is what we see inside of us. Its best for UMNO to meditate what's its god is. Is it Allah or other-than-Allah.
Kata saya ...
Soi Lek is asking his tuan to accommodate him further. So did his predecessor. So did his predecessor's predecessor. So did his predecessor's predecessor's predecessor. They have been asking (conning?) for accommodation after accommodation after accommodation from their tuan ever since.
He asks from somebody who owns something. This makes that somebody the 'tuan punya'. But he refuses to acknowledge openly that this 'tuan' is the 'tuan yang empunya' simply because he refuses to learn the kesopanan dan kesusilaan of this 'tuan'. If this 'tuan' is orang putih, he would have no problem.
Without these handouts, these accommodation that he 'kautim' out of 'tuan punya kedaulatan', he just cannot move forward, he just cannot get any 'changes' at all. Any small change for this pengemis politik someone?
Repeat. "Without these handouts, these accommodation that he 'kautim' out of tuan punya kedaulatan, he just cannot move forward, he just cannot make any 'changes'."
Flip the pages of history. Look for any advancement without first being awarded with some semblance of accommodation. Look at the constitution. Most are values accommodated ... by the tuan punya kedaulatan.
Let us look at the Chi of PKR. Without the Mal (of PKR) can he be there now? Can the DAP be where it is without the PKR? Where would PKR & PR be without PAS. Where would MCA MIC be without UMNO. This is looking beyond ethnicity. The majority is the tuan punya kedaulatan.
"If Keadilan can project itself to be multiracial and be able to look after the interests of CHI or Indian community, it raises the possibility that MCA, MIC GERAKAN may not be relevant anymore." says Soi Lek.
So in order for you to stay relevant your ask your tuan to make the change? For a change, why not you make some 'changes'. You all are 50 year-old adults since merdeka. Act like one and stop this 'gun-boat' 'reality-showmanship' for accommodation.
This tuan doesn't aspire to be supreme over anybody as you put it. Allah Encompasses His Supremacy over all other than Him. What this 'tuan punya kedaulatan' doesn't want is a roommate that slyly works for more space for himself, that 'cry wolf' to win for himself accommodation by deviously juggling the universal call for 'change' whilst excluding himself from his pious call.
Our complacency cost us two-third majority and 5 states. They figured we are at our weakest. They would never want our political enemy to beg for any further 'Batu Putih'. They are too smart for that.
So they asked our roommate & bedfellow to do it so as not to be too obvious. So this 'advertisement' speech is put forward to get his master to make further 'changes'.
Must look beyond ethnicity indeed. Does he (did they? did they? did they?) make / made any relevant 'changes' at all? They never change. Soi Lek uses 'the 308 tsunami' to justify his 'gun-boat diplomacy' so that the faint-hearted 'see the logic' of the argument.
"Must produce what is advertised" otherwise no buyer. By that he means "Must accommodate further otherwise the CHI would not vote for me." He is appealing to our
'kera-di-hutan-disusukan-anak-di-pangkuan-mati-kelaparan' weakness and forever generosity.
Its best to 'Buat baik berpada-pada, buat jahat jangan sekali'. Its best the 'change' is not what Soi Lek demand of us. Its best that this 'change' is what we see inside of us. Its best for UMNO to meditate what's its god is. Is it Allah or other-than-Allah.
Friday, November 28, 2008
THE X FACTOR
First, don't get me wrong. I am never a patron of these road side teh-tarik stalls named BN or PR. Their dishes are all half cooked. And what I am going to say is not of any leaning to any ethnicity.
A) Consider well, so that we leave our country with an open option.
1) People tell us that BN’s strength is crumbling. People also have not tell us where is PR’s strength.
2) People tell us that BN is a dying relic. People also haven’t shown us what sustains PR’s existence.
3) People tells us not to vote for MIC. People also forget to tell us what ‘mic’ will fight for us in the PR.
4) Something may cause all Chinese to vote for PKR. It also can cause all Bumis to vote for UMNO.
5) We neglect ourselves not to look into the ‘PAS factor.’
6) For all we know, PAS can be the ‘kingmaker’.
7) Whoever’s table PAS decides to join for breakfast, that table will ascend to the throne.
B) We are looking for something that will cater for its kind whilst not neglecting all the other kinds, something that will not only be saksama, sama-rata-sama-rasa, but more so that has the strength to be adil. We have to look for someone who caters his home well while not neglecting all his neighbors, even if he is not popular.
Yes strength and adil are mutually complementary.
A) Consider well, so that we leave our country with an open option.
1) People tell us that BN’s strength is crumbling. People also have not tell us where is PR’s strength.
2) People tell us that BN is a dying relic. People also haven’t shown us what sustains PR’s existence.
3) People tells us not to vote for MIC. People also forget to tell us what ‘mic’ will fight for us in the PR.
4) Something may cause all Chinese to vote for PKR. It also can cause all Bumis to vote for UMNO.
5) We neglect ourselves not to look into the ‘PAS factor.’
6) For all we know, PAS can be the ‘kingmaker’.
7) Whoever’s table PAS decides to join for breakfast, that table will ascend to the throne.
B) We are looking for something that will cater for its kind whilst not neglecting all the other kinds, something that will not only be saksama, sama-rata-sama-rasa, but more so that has the strength to be adil. We have to look for someone who caters his home well while not neglecting all his neighbors, even if he is not popular.
Yes strength and adil are mutually complementary.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
What Now
People say Tun Mahathir’s Malaysia is less ‘democratic’ as compared to Pak Lah’s Malaysia. Tun’s Malaysia was less chaotic than Pak Lah’s ‘more democratic’ Malaysia.
Singapore’s democracy is ruled by an iron fist. Malaysia’s democracy is now ruled by a free-for-all ‘open fist’. (Ever come across an ‘open fist’?) SD is twice MR in value.
China is not a democratic country at all. India is a democratic ( err not too democratic) nation. China is doing better than India.
Kuwait is partially democratic. The monarchies of the Persian Gulf are ... simply monarchies. Kuwait is lagging behind.
Palestine and Lebanon leaders are democratically elected. Their neighbors, the more ‘authoritarian’ Arab states are doing better.
Wander what’s happening in the rest of the democratic west now compared to the not so democratic ... say Russia?
Malaysia being of the east, should not settle for Obama of the west then? May be the PM in-wating is not good enough? We should go back to the east and invite ... a 'Wali Songo' instead?
Singapore’s democracy is ruled by an iron fist. Malaysia’s democracy is now ruled by a free-for-all ‘open fist’. (Ever come across an ‘open fist’?) SD is twice MR in value.
China is not a democratic country at all. India is a democratic ( err not too democratic) nation. China is doing better than India.
Kuwait is partially democratic. The monarchies of the Persian Gulf are ... simply monarchies. Kuwait is lagging behind.
Palestine and Lebanon leaders are democratically elected. Their neighbors, the more ‘authoritarian’ Arab states are doing better.
Wander what’s happening in the rest of the democratic west now compared to the not so democratic ... say Russia?
Malaysia being of the east, should not settle for Obama of the west then? May be the PM in-wating is not good enough? We should go back to the east and invite ... a 'Wali Songo' instead?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)